Texas Man Sentenced To 9 Years In Prison After Buying Lamborghini $1.6 Million

Texas Man Sentenced To 9 Years In Prison After Buying Lamborghini $1.6 Million

Texas Man Sentenced To 9 Years In Prison After Buying Lamborghini $1.6 Million

Texas man, who bought Lamborghini on a $1.6 million PPP loan, sentenced to 9 years in prison.

A Texas man has been sentenced to nine years in prison after police say he fraudulently obtained $1.6 million in coronavirus credit, bought a Lamborghini and other items.

Lee Price III, 30, pleaded guilty to bribery and money laundering after submitting bogus loan applications for the Paycheck Protection Program, according to a Justice Department press release in September.

Price reportedly spent the money on some personal purchases, such as a Lamborghini Urus, a 2020 Ford F-250 pickup truck, and a Rolex watch. Authorities also say they have proof that he spends thousands of dollars on nightclubs in Houston.

Reportedly, he made copies of the number of employees and salary payments in each of the loan applications. He also applied for a loan on behalf of a deceased person before submitting it.

PPP loans were part of the $2,000 billion Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, passed by Congress in March 2020 after the COVID-19 pandemic hit everyone in the United States.


Families of Astroworld Victims Reject Travis Scott Offer To Pay Funeral Expenses

Families of Astroworld Victims Reject Travis Scott Offer To Pay Funeral Expenses

Families of Astroworld Victims Reject Travis Scott Offer To Pay Funeral Expenses

Half of the families of Astroworld victims who died at the festival last month declined the rapper’s offer to pay for the funeral.

Scott offers to take care of the funerals of all the victims. However, Rolling Stone reports that the families of five victims declined his offer.

Earlier this week, the family of nine-year-old Ezra Blount announced that they would not accept the rapper’s offer, and family lawyer Bob Hilliard wrote that he was “certainly Mr Scott feels remorse” about the incident .

“His journey ahead is going to be painful,” Hilliard continued. “He must realize this and hope he takes some responsibility for this tragedy.”

Many lawyers are now talking about Scott’s decision to decline the offer. Richard Mithoff, an attorney for the family of 14-year-old victim John Hilgert, who recently filed a lawsuit against the rapper for the tragedy, said the offer was “undervalued and genuinely inappropriate.”

“It’s not an offer [the Hilgerts] are seriously considering,” Mithoff told Rolling Stone.

“Of all the things this case is about, this is the least worrying. This family is starting to change and make sure it never happens again at a concert.”

Philip Corboy, lawyer for the families of Jacob Jurinek and Franco Patino, said Scott’s approach – through legal teams – made it clear to the families “that he was only trying to contain the public uprising around his case.”

“When he tries to impress families that he is sincere, caring and realizes that funerals can be expensive, what Scott’s team has done is not the way to go,” he said. Corboy continued.

“You haven’t received a single letter from a Beverly Hills lawyer saying he’s representing Travis Scott. These families are still intact; they lack personal contact.”

Tony Buzbee, who represents the Axel Acosta family, was more open about Scott and called the offer “bullshit”.

“If you spoke badly about these families, you wouldn’t have to issue a press release to show people that he was prepared to pay for a funeral,” Buzbee continued.

“He said he felt sorry for them, but he was quick to say it wasn’t his fault. He was no different from any other accused who was pointing fingers at others. They don’t want funeral expenses from him. Whatever we do get from him, we go through the legal system.”

Buzbee had previously filed a $ 750 million (£ 555 million) lawsuit on behalf of the 125 festival-goers, saying: “No amount of money will ever make these plaintiffs live well; no amount of money can restore human life.

“But the damages claimed in this case are intended to restore, sustain or compensate for the damage and loss of these plaintiffs – no more and no less.”

This lawsuit is just one of many lawsuits against Travis Scott, Live Nation and other parties involved in the festival.

Travis Scott

Travis Scott – Family of 14-year-old Astroworld Victim Files Lawsuit

Travis Scott has been charged again over his Astroworld Festival with fatal outcome. According to Rolling Stone, the relatives of 14-year-old John Hilgert, one of the ten visitors who died during the festival in Houston at the beginning of this month, are demanding compensation from the rapper for negligence.

The charges against the fatal Astroworld Festival continue to rise. In addition, over 46 charges have been filed against the rapper Travis Scott.

Hilgert’s parents also want changes to be made in the organization of concerts and festivals. For example, they argue for better security and more medical assistance on the ground. Scott and the organizers of the Astroworld Festival have been criticized for not shutting down the event sooner when chaos ensued and people were killed.

The rapper now has dozens of charges hanging on his neck. The cause of the fatal incidents is under investigation. It’s unknown how many more lawsuits will be filed by families of other victims.

No doubt, it has really been a nightmare for Travis Scott. Time will tell if this year’s end will bring light to the situation or blackness.

What do you think about this? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!

Astroworld Tragedy Travis Scott Is Facing A 750 Million Lawsuit In Court THEURBANSPOTLIGHT.COM

Astroworld Tragedy – Travis Scott Is Facing A $750 Million Lawsuit In Court

After the Astroworld catastrophe, Travis Scott has been under a lot of strain. Following the show’s deadly toll of ten fatalities and hundreds of injuries, Scott has faced numerous lawsuits from the relatives of those who died. The artist now faces an even more daunting challenge.

Since the incident, the rapper has been trapped in his home, according to reports. While his attorney stated that La Flame was unaware of the tragedy until later, he has missed out on several crucial deals.

The release of Nike’s collaborative shoes with Scott has been delayed. With the mounting legal difficulties piling up, Scott now faces an even larger obstacle.

125 fans and the families of the victims in the calamity have now filed a lawsuit against Travis Scott, Drake, Apple, Live Nation, and other corporations.TMZ reports that $750 million is being sought as compensation for those who were injured or died as a result of the Astroworld fire. The lawsuit, which was filed, demands money for both physical and mental health issues as well as the loss of life.

The case is handled by Houston attorney Tony Buzbee, who said:

The families of the deceased are entitled to compensation that will compensate them for what they have lost. No amount of money can ever repair or replace their lives. The damages sought in this case, on the other hand, attempt to compensate these plaintiffs for their losses and injuries — nothing more and nothing less.

After the tragedy, Travis Scott and Astroworld offered all of their attendees a refund.

No doubt, the lawsuits and the serious nature of the incident will most likely prevent any brands or media outlets from working with Scott in the future.

What’s your thoughts on Travis Scott being sued $750 million for the accident in Astroworld? Comment below.

U.S. Lawsuit Claims That Subways Tuna Include Meat From Other Animals THEURBANSPOTLIGHT.COM

U.S. Lawsuit Claims That Subway’s Tuna Include Meat From Other Animals

U.S. lawsuit was filed against Subway, alleging that it used “deceptive marketing and labeling” to promote its products as healthier than they were.

According to a third version of the complaint, Subway’s tuna products contained chicken, pork and cattle DNA in samples, according to Reuters on Thursday.

The company “duped” customers by implying that its sandwiches were healthier than they are.

According to the news source, on Monday, Karen Dhanowa and Nilima Amin sued Subway for selling tuna sandwiches that they claim violated California law. According to the lawsuit, a marine biologist tested 20 samples of tuna products taken from over a dozen southern California Subway restaurants and found that 19 of them had “no detectable tuna DNA sequences.”

All 20 test samples, according to court documents, contained chicken DNA, 11 items included pork DNA, and seven contained cattle DNA.

A Subway spokesperson rejected the lawsuit, stating in a statement that “the plaintiffs have filed three meritless complaints, each time changing their story.”

“This third, most recent amended claim was only submitted after their previous complaint was rightfully dismissed by a federal judge. Our legal team is currently reviewing the plaintiffs’ amended claim and will file a new motion to dismiss this irresponsible and unlawful lawsuit once we have completed our evaluation.” “The reality is that Subway tuna is genuine and strictly controlled by the FDA in the United States, as well as other government bodies across the world.”

Subway is no stranger to food-related lawsuits, however, its tuna has brought in controversies.

The New York Times reported in June that, after purchasing 60 inches of Subway tuna sandwiches from three separate locations, it could not find any identifiable tuna DNA.

Subway said that DNA testing is not a reliable method to identify denatured proteins, such as Subway’s tuna, which was cooked before it was tested.”

In response, they have set up a website to defend itself from such claims, including a “Tuna facts check.”




Be the first to know when our Urban Hotties is released.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Contact Details

P.O Box 690746
East Elmhurst, NY 11369


© Copyright – 2021 The Urban Spotlight –  All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy   Terms of Service | Find us On